<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Torn postal ballots advantage the BNP</title>
		<description>Comments for Torn postal ballots advantage the BNP at http://www.blackburnlabour.org , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.blackburnlabour.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:43:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.blackburnlabour.org/blog/Torn-postal-ballots-advantage-the-BNP.html#comment-168</link>
			<description>In response to a couple of emails we've had - I think there is some confusion here, please allow me to clarify. I have not referred to marks made by voters, only to the 'official mark'. This is an icon at the top of the ballot to ensure that it has been printed properly. This is completely different from the marks made by voters to indicate their choice of candidate.

There is nothing improper about this at all. One doesn't actually have to see the paper at all as we have been told this is the situation by the Electoral Registration Officer. Indeed, we are aware of a number of complaints on this issue from across the country. - mpoultney</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:45:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.blackburnlabour.org/blog/Torn-postal-ballots-advantage-the-BNP.html#comment-165</link>
			<description>Very funny! Postal voting friends of mine expressed amazement at the wodge of paper that had to be stuffed back into the envelope.

Maybe this cockup is what it takes to make you (rightly) suspicious of postal voting in general. - John Egan</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:55 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.blackburnlabour.org/blog/Torn-postal-ballots-advantage-the-BNP.html#comment-164</link>
			<description>This is a bit rich coming from Blackburn Labour Party! - JOHN K</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:06:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
